STINNER Victor added the comment: My previous benchmark runs were with the system Python 3.3.
New benchmark with a Python 3.5 patched with scandir-1.patch (compiled in release mode: ./configure && make). "os" (os.scandir) is 2 times faster than "c" (_scandir.scandir_helper): c=0.533 sec, os=0.268 sec. On all implementations, scandir.walk() is only much faster than os.walk() when "os" (os.scandir) is used: "3.2x as fast" (860 ms => 268 ms). I guess that on Linux the speedup highly depends on the number of symbolic links. It would help if benchmark.py created the tree to have more reliable numbers, and being able to compare trees without symlinks, with a few symlinks (ex: 10%), and with a lot of symlinks (ex: 99%). Benchmark results: haypo@smithers$ ~/prog/python/default/python setup.py build && for scandir in generic python c os; do echo; echo "=== $scandir ==="; PYTHONPATH=build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.5/ ~/prog/python/default/python benchmark.py /usr/share -c $scandir || break; done running build running build_py copying scandir.py -> build/lib.linux-x86_64-3.5 running build_ext === generic === Using very slow generic version of scandir Comparing against builtin version of os.walk() Priming the system's cache... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 1/3... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 2/3... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 3/3... os.walk took 0.857s, scandir.walk took 1.627s -- 0.5x as fast === python === Using slower ctypes version of scandir Comparing against builtin version of os.walk() Priming the system's cache... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 1/3... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 2/3... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 3/3... os.walk took 0.856s, scandir.walk took 0.915s -- 0.9x as fast === c === Using fast C version of scandir Comparing against builtin version of os.walk() Priming the system's cache... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 1/3... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 2/3... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 3/3... os.walk took 0.857s, scandir.walk took 0.533s -- 1.6x as fast === os === Using Python 3.5's builtin os.scandir() Comparing against builtin version of os.walk() Priming the system's cache... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 1/3... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 2/3... Benchmarking walks on /usr/share, repeat 3/3... os.walk took 0.860s, scandir.walk took 0.268s -- 3.2x as fast ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22524> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
