Martin Panter added the comment: I think you are right that it would be typically used as a decorator. Patch v2 changes it to be defined as a decorator.
Not sure what the second part of your comment is referring to. The existing text about lack of __await__() maybe? You still have to have something (such as “asyncio”) drive the top-level coroutine. So that is a third thing users have to do with them. Passing a coroutine to “await” does not magically make it go, it just becomes a subordinate of the outer coroutine. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40092/coro-idempotent.v2.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24692> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
