Yury Selivanov added the comment: > I agree with Stefan and Yury. As for the tests, Yury seemed to have those in > his patches -- I'll take a look and see if they're directly applicable.
Good idea, the tests are in a fine shape. > For Python 3.5 and earlier, there is a workaround to awaiting for concurrent > Futures, but it requires the use of the undocumented wrap_future() function. > It is the fact that it's undocumented that bothers me. I didn't even know about it :( Please create an issue. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24383> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com