Peter Landry added the comment: Yeah, I think that makes the most sense to me as well. I tried to make a minimum-impact patch, but this feels cleaner.
If we remove the Content-Length header, the `limit` kwarg might occur at an odd place in the part itself, but that feels unavoidable if someone submits an incorrect Content-Length for the request itself. I'll re-work the patch and make sure the tests I added still add value. Thanks! ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24764> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
