Antti Haapala added the comment:
It is this change in 3.2:
randrange is more sophisticated about producing equally distributed
values. Formerly it used a style like ``int(random()*n)`` which '
could produce slightly uneven distributions.
- return self._randbelow(istart)
+ if istart >= maxwidth:
+ return self._randbelow(istart)
+ return int(self.random() * istart)
by rhettinger. Since there has not been any regression tests that the seeded
numbers would stay compatible, they don't. Perhaps it would be a good idea to
*add* such tests.
----------
nosy: +ztane
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue27742>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
