New submission from Jason Matthew:

Fairly new to MSIs here.  Working towards extracting the same information which 
is available via Orca graphical interfaces.  

I believe I've hit a bug within _msi.View class, namely the inability to safely 
determine the number of records in my result.  

Examples I've found depicting how to obtain query results lead me to believe 
_msi.View.Fetch() will return None if no more rows exist.  My development using 
python 2.7.11, Windows 7 enterprise and 2.7.13, Windows Server 2016, has shown 
Fetch() will raise a msilib.MSIError when no more rows are available.  MSIError 
is commonly used within msilib which means explicit error handling (or leniency 
in this case) may incorrectly suppress other error scenarios.

Entering a bug with the hope either a patch addresses this issue or 
documentation can be updated to reflect proper usage.  Example provided below.


    >>> import msilib
    >>> db = msilib.OpenDatabase("msi-1.0.0.8.msi", msilib.MSIDBOPEN_READONLY)
    >>> v = db.OpenView("select * from Property")
    >>> v.Execute(None)
    >>> while 1:
    ...     r = v.Fetch()
    ...     if not r:break
    ...     print r.GetString(1)
    ...
    UpgradeCode
    WixSharp_UI_INSTALLDIR
    WixSharp_InstallDialogs
    WIXUI_INSTALLDIR
    Manufacturer
    ProductCode
    ProductLanguage
    ProductName
    ProductVersion
    SecureCustomProperties
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 2, in <module>
    _msi.MSIError: unknown error 103

----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 286204
nosy: Jason Matthew
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: msilib Fetch raises MSIError rather than return None
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29364>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to