Nick Coghlan added the comment:
This is going to be the case anytime an attempt is made to combine parent
classes with incompatible constructor signatures. "type" is unusual in that it
goes to great lengths to present an adaptive signature that aligns with
whatever the class definition does.
The main relevant trick is to filter the extra arguments out from those passed
to metaclasses such that only init_subclass sees them:
================
def ignore_extra_args(base):
base_meta = type(base)
class _FilteredMeta(base_meta):
def __new__(*args, **kwds):
return base_meta.__new__(*args)
def __init__(*args, **kwds):
return base_meta.__init__(*args)
class _Filtered(base, metaclass=_FilteredMeta):
pass
return _Filtered
class InitX():
def __init_subclass__(cls, x=None):
print('x')
from abc import ABCMeta
class Abstract(metaclass=ABCMeta):
pass
class AbstractWithInit(ignore_extra_args(Abstract), InitX, x=1):
pass
AbstractWithInit()
================
If folks were to iterate on "ignore_extra_args" variants outside the standard
library with 3.6, then it would be something we could sensibly standardise for
3.7.
----------
nosy: +ncoghlan
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29581>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
