Mario Corchero added the comment: Sample implementation using the new class: https://github.com/mariocj89/cpython/commit/2f13963159e239de041cd68273b9fc4a2aa778cd
Sample implementation using the new function to seal existing mocks: https://github.com/mariocj89/cpython/commit/9ba039e3996f4bf357d4827123e0b570d84f5bb6 Happy to submit a PR if the idea is accepted. The only benefit I see from the using a separate class is that you will be able to do: >>> m = mock.SealedMock() >>> m.important_attr = 42 >>> m.freeflow_attribute = mock.Mock() >>> mock.seal(m) which will allow to define "subparts of the mock" without the sealing. That said I still prefer the function implementation as it looks much nicer (credit to Victor Stinner for the idea) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30541> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
