Mark Dickinson added the comment: [Serhiy] > is it worth to mention explicitly that round(number) and round(number, None) > > delegate to number.__round__()?
Yes, if we can find a non-clunky wording that does that. The current wording does seem to misleadingly suggest that the delegation to `__round__` only happens for the two-argument version of round. How about just: > For a general Python object ``number``, ``round`` delegates to > ``number.__round__``. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30940> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
