Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: I think we still want the full tuple passed to connect(). We may want to truncate the tuple when used for other purposes.
Le 07/12/2017 à 00:41, Matthew Stoltenberg a écrit : > > Matthew Stoltenberg <d3m...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > The naive change is to have the host, port tuple assignment use only the > first two values from address. I can open a PR with that change (and update > the docstring for the function) if that's the right change. For reference, > the python socketpair implementation (if _socket is missing it) ignores > flow_info and scope_id, but I'm not sure that's the right thing to do. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue32224> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32224> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
