New submission from Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com>:
There's a fairly extensive discussion here:
https://github.com/python/asyncio/pull/465
In short, asyncio.run() is a pretty straightforward addition, so let's add it.
The discussion was more focused on the asyncio.run_forever() proposal. I now
think that it shouldn't be implemented in asyncio. Instead we should fix cases
where 'loop.run_forever' is usually required. Mainly that's servers, and they
are easily fixable by making "Server" an async context manager and implementing
a "server.serve_forever()" method. That way, with asyncio.run():
async def serve_something():
async with asyncio.start_server(...) as server:
await server.serve_forever()
asyncio.run(serve_something()) # No loop.run_forever()!
----------
assignee: yselivanov
components: asyncio
messages: 308256
nosy: asvetlov, lukasz.langa, yselivanov
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Implement asyncio.run()
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.7
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32314>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
