Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivs...@gmail.com> added the comment: > I liked the original design better, where things without annotations would > just be ignored. What changed?
With the original proposal the ignored variables without annotations will behave as class variables. This "conflicts" with PEP 526 which requires class variables to be annotated with ClassVar[...]. On the other hand some people may be unhappy that they need to import `typing` to define a class variable in a dataclass. So this is a convenience vs consistence question. I am more in favour of consistence here, but only +0. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32428> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
