Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivs...@gmail.com> added the comment:
FWIW I am rather -1 on this. More detailed errors messages are always good, but in the proposed form it looks more like a distraction. I think just showing a fully qualified name of the function would be both more concise and more informative, since the user would likely need to look at the function code/docstring anyway in order to write a correct call. ---------- nosy: +levkivskyi _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34254> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
