Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> added the comment:
I'm agreeing with all the other core devs (other than Victor ;) that I don't quite think this should go in. While I appreciate the work Pierre put into the PR, I just can't find myself to want to deal with future bug reports for this while http.server is meant for really simple testing scenarios. My suggestion would be to toss it up on PyPI and if there is major uptake then we can revisit this, but right now I just don't think the long-term support costs are worth the benefit the new feature brings. ---------- nosy: +brett.cannon stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue30576> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
