Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> added the comment:
For the benefit of PR 37207, I would like to re-open this discussion. It may have been rejected for the wrong reasons. Victor's patch was quite inefficient, but that's to be expected: msg285744 mentions a two-step process, but during the discussion the second steps seems to have been forgotten. ---------- nosy: +jdemeyer _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue29312> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
