Leandro Lima <lean...@limaesilva.com.br> added the comment:
IMV, the adopted solution creates a problem of a mismatch between the signature and the function behavior. I was just hit by this, as I never cared to specify digestmod trusting that Python defaults are usually sound choices. I agree that changing the signature would break more code, but the choice made here violates the principle of least astonishment. An error that could be caught by a static analysis tool silently entered the code base to be provoked only when the function got called. The choice to break compatibility was already made. Introducing silent bugs is something that I think we should avoid. I've wrote an argument about this in a different message, and I'm not sure if I should repeat it here. Here's the link to it: https://bugs.python.org/msg357551 ---------- nosy: +Leandro Lima _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33604> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
