Batuhan Taskaya <batuhanosmantask...@gmail.com> added the comment:
@serhiy.storchaka, with these ASDL signatures, I have a patch that would omit default values for both Nones and [] in case they are redundant. But this is a bit different than your approach so I wanted to ask what's your opinion about adding an extra argument called omit_defaults, and only omit defaults it present. I'm adding this because unlike your first patch, these aren't actually defaults when creating the objects (like ast.Module(body=[x]) != ast.Module(body=[x], type_ignores=[])) so doing anything other than looking to that representation would be different than the actual result. What're your opinions about this? (I'm submitting the initial version of the patch before doing a PR) ---------- Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file48975/ast.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36287> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
