Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
[Eric] > this is documented behavior [Mark] > I definitely wouldn't want to see nans translated to > "null" by default. I concur with both of these statements. I would support adding an option (off by default) to convert NaNs to None. While NaNs were originally intended to indicate an invalid value, they sometimes get used to denote missing values. In those situations, it would be reasonable to convert NaN to null. ---------- nosy: +rhettinger _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40633> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
