Georg Brandl <ge...@python.org> added the comment:
This grammar specification doesn't contain a full specification of code that won't raise SyntaxError. There are several conditions that aren't checked by the generated parser, but at a later stage in the compilation process. While probably possible to express in general, this would make the grammar much more complex. For this example, it would require different definitions of `suite`, `stmt`, `simple_stmt`, `compound_stmt` and so on, to track where control-flow statements are allowed. Other definitions need to track `nonlocal` and you'd get a combinatorial explosion of productions. You could propose a PR to add a note somewhere on that page (but on the master branch, not 3.6 which is unmaintained). ---------- nosy: +georg.brandl _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42284> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
