Catherine Devlin <catherinedev...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Thinking about this a little more... I suggest that slowing down execution shouldn't be a worry in this case, because trying to parse a garbage string into a date shouldn't be something code is doing zillions of times, and if it is, being slow isn't a terrible thing. It should be the exception (so to speak) and not the rule, and thus not something we should worry about optimizing for. That said, I can see not wanting to rely on throwing low-level errors that are outside Python's direct control. (In fact, the PR I wrote didn't account for the OS-dependent nature of those messages, so if we decide to go ahead after all I'll need to make my PR account for that.) If that is enough reason to reject the change, I'm content with that. One way or the other, I would love to get this out of "Open" status - if we want to just close it as-is, I'll be satisfied. ---------- nosy: +catherinedevlin _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue24929> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
