Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> added the comment:
When talking about making exit only work when typed at the interpreter,
something to consider is the confusion that it can cause when there is a
mismatch between the interactive interpreter and noninteractive execution,
especially for novice users. I've seen beginner users add exit() to the bottom
of Python scripts, presumably because the interpreter "taught" them that you
have to end with that.
Now imagine someone trying to use exit as part of control flow
if input("exit now? ") == "yes":
exit
Unless exit is a full blown keyword, that won't work. And the result is yet
another instance in the language where users become confused if they run across
it, because it isn't actually consistent in the language model.
There are already pseudo-keywords in the language, in particular, super(), but
that's used to implement something which would be impossible otherwise. Exiting
is not impossible otherwise, it just requires typing (). But that's how
everything in the language works. I would argue it's a good thing to reinforce
the idea that typing a variable by itself with no other surrounding syntax does
nothing. This helps new users create the correct model of the language in their
heads.
----------
nosy: +asmeurer
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44603>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
