Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Lines 500-504 are the ones that trigger it. Ah, right. Thanks. > Apparently there are no tests in that file for straight exp() Yes - that file was mostly written to give good coverage for places where we'd written our own implementations rather than simply wrapping an existing libm function, though I think we've now reverted to using the libm expm1 in all cases. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46018> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
