STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
> If we have static types, that means there is a mechanism to share some > objects across interpreters. Sharing objects between interpreters is bad and is causing complex bugs. See a recent example of an object traveling from one interpreter to another and then causing a random crash on Windows related to the garbage collector: * https://bugs.python.org/issue46070 * https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30577#pullrequestreview-852106207 > And if that's the case, why can't small ints (like > sys.float_info.n_unnamed_fields) be static & shared as well? I would prefer to discuss that in other issues like bpo-40255 or bpo-39511, and focus this issue on fixing the static types implementation when Python is embedded in an application. -- Hum, this issue is not really related to sub-interpreters. My proposed PR only changes Py_Finalize(): the main interpreter. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46417> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
