Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment:
Playing tricks where compile-time and run-time see slightly different types is probably more productive than trying to revert a PR that was in Python 3.9 and 3.10. :-) I'm not opposed to supporting generic NamedTuple, but I expect the fix will never hit 3.9 and 3.10, and it needs to be a "fix forward" PR. Would you mind closing the "revert" PR unmerged? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43923> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
