Jean-Paul Calderone <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> added the comment: Thanks for bringing this up.
I think you have more work to do to successfully make the case that L.insert(0, x) is "difficult" enough to merit the addition of a new list method. There are already at least two in-place insert-at-front list APIs (the second being L[:0] = [x]). There should be a very compelling reason for adding a third, and I don't think that being able to skip the extra 0 in the L.insert version is going to suffice. ---------- nosy: +exarkun resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9080> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
