On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 11:54, Aurelien Bompard <abomp...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > most of the packages I've seen lack the python3_other bits (no > > statistics, just my impression). > > That's my impression too. > > > Is this something we want? If so, are the packagers willing to adapt > > their packages (as much as I'd like to do this, I lack the resources to > > hack on 228 packages)? > > I've done quite a few but it's in the tens, not the hundreds. However, winter > is coming and it's a nice activity when you're down with the flu. > > I've noticed that the with_python3_other variable isn't defined in the file > shipped by python3-rpm-macros, it would help transition to set that variable > as in the original plan. The edits I've done use that variable as a > conditional. Or shouldn't they? > > I'm interesting in having more python3.6 packages in EPEL7 since newer > releases of Mailman3 requires Python >= 3.5, so I'm currently stuck by some > missing dependencies. So I'm willing to help move this forward.
So I would like to get this done in November after F29 is out the door. I am guessing a set of changes will be needed to be tested before hand. -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
