On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:10:13PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > > Somehow the BSD license in pylama-7.0.9/pylama/__init__.py does not make > > sense. Can you please ask upstream about this? > > Submit an issue to upstream (https://github.com/klen/pylama/issues/64).
After six months upstream still does not response the two licenses problem in pylama-7.0.9/pylama/__init__.py. Is it feasible to list this file as dual license (BSD-3-clause or LGPL-3+) ? -- ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czc...@debian.org> Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen) Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790 8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
