On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: > Paul Murrell <p.murrell <at> auckland.ac.nz> writes: > >> >> Hi >> >> On 12/02/2011 7:22 p.m., Michael Sumner wrote: >>> Hello, that appears to have fixed it. Thank you very much. >>> >>> I can now repeat the reported workflow and the image appears on the >>> fifth (and subsequent) calls. >> >> Great. Thanks for checking. >> >> Paul >> > > > That's great. > > Just a little bump: I would encourage Simon (in his copious spare > time), or other interested members of R-core, to decide on a good > name for the argument (as a reminder, I prefer 'method=c("raster","image")'). > Furthermore, I would strongly encourage that "raster" be made the default > behavior for the development release of R ... >
Unfortunately I just encountered a speed bump today - I had no idea that the Windows device doesn't even support transparent pixels. That needs to be fixed before we can make it the default... Cheers, Simon ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel