Dear all, After having a look at the "inline" package and also going through the "Rcpp" package which is tighty related to it, it came to me this question:
1) my C/ C++ code has a return type (let say a double[][] or a user define class) 2) I am working with an extensive library built by someone else and I don't have the time/knowledge to change it by means of working with "pointer" variables in order to avoid the return sentence,,, question A: can I use the -inline- "cfunction" without resorting to the Rcpp functionality? -- if this is true, question A2: do I need to go deep in the source code coming from the library (that I am trying to use) to perform the interface through the Rcpp classes? questionB: is it true that the working with the -inline- function you have to have only void return type code? -- if this is false, questionB2: do you have a simple example of this? Many thanks Sergio Barrios -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Inline-Package-void-vs-return-type-functions-tp1838423p1838423.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.