> But for the broader question, Jeff is saying that there really are 700 > packages that are in potential trouble!
I think that's rather an overstatement of the problem — there's nothing wrong with plyr; it's just no longer under active development. If anything, plyr is one of the safest packages to depend upon because you can know it will never change :) Hadley -- http://hadley.nz ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
