В Sat, 20 Jan 2024 14:38:55 -0500 Johann Gaebler <m...@jgaeb.com> пишет:
> The issue is that the compiled libraries are too large. Was it in the e-mail? As you quite correctly observed, many other packages get the NOTE about shared library size. It may be not exactly obvious, but the red link saying "LTO" on the check page that points to <https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/LTO/rar.out> is hiding a more serious issue: > cpp11.cpp:18:13: warning: 'run_testthat_tests' violates the C++ One > Definition Rule [-Wodr] > 18 | extern SEXP run_testthat_tests(void *); > | ^ > /data/gannet/ripley/R/test-dev/testthat/include/testthat/testthat.h:172:17: > note: 'run_testthat_tests' was previously declared here > 172 | extern "C" SEXP run_testthat_tests(SEXP use_xml_sxp) { > | ^ Modern C++ compilers are painfully pedantic about undefined behaviour and can optimise away large sections of code if they think they have a proof that your code causes it [*]. If you edit cpp11.cpp to provide the correct declaration (#include the testthat header if possible), the error should go away. -- Best regards, Ivan [*] For example, see this issue in R: https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18430 ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
