Hi. Agreed. For REPP, should be more productive to update the regext charter to help leverage the expertise from this WG.
Jasdip From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Maarten Wullink <maarten.wullink=40sidn...@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 2:23 AM To: George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> Cc: regext@ietf.org <regext@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [regext] Re-chartering REGEXT? Hi George and others, > > > The protocol is in the registry-registrar and client-registrar > interaction space we work on. Thank you George, that was just the point i was trying to make. For the re-charter discussion It does not really matter if we define something such as REPP to be a transport or not. The point is that there should be a place in the IETF for EPP related work and this WG should be it. Updating the charter to allow the WG to work on more than just extensions. Best, Maarten _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
