control: found -1 3.4.0-1 control: notfound -1 3.4.0-1.0~reproducible2 Hi Dirk,
I've asked Ximin to file this bug so that we have something to track and to refer in discussions… you wrote: > At work now with limited time, but I think I already told you twice that > there were two of the three parts of the patch you proposed to upstream that > I would not take, were I upstream (which I am not). Dirk, could you please point out (here in this bug report) which of the two parts you consider unsuitable? Ximin, looking at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/r-base.git/log/?h=pu/reproducible_builds I believe it would be best to merge those two (top most) commits into one? > A decent longer-term strategy may well to stress-test the patch by including > it in our builds for a while. We can work on that. actually we've been using Ximin's patches on tests.reproducible-builds.org since the 2nd of May on amd64 and since the 3rd on arm64, armhf and i386. According to https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/index_performance.html (top row labeled "oldest build result) in the first table on the right) this means we've almost done a full rebuild with the patch on amd64+arm64 (probably 85% done now) and pretty close to that on i386… According to this, this patch seems to work well… -- cheers, Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
