I think we can count this as a bug:

http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=4195

We should at least have an option not to override your existing
/etc/init.d/resin -- we do recommend editing this file with your local
changes.

Best,
Emil

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 03:20:34PM +0200, Mattias Jiderhamn wrote:
> How then are you supposed to go about upgrading Resin? Is there a parameter to
> the "configure" script to avoid creating/overwriting /etc/init.d/resin?
> If not, could such parameter be added...?
> 
>  </Mattias>
> 
> jkowall wrote (2010-08-31 14:45):
> 
>     On RHEL, it should be /etc/init.d/ for sure, and you manage the startup
>     scripts with /sbin/sysconfig 
> 
>     -jk
> 
> 
>     On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Mattias Jiderhamn <
>     mj-li...@expertsystems.se> wrote:
> 
>         We are on RedHat Enterprise Linux 4/5.
> 
>         Note that the question is not the configuration itself, but *where* is
>         the proper place for such configuration. The file we use now is
>         overwritten with "the one which ships with Resin" on every Resin
>         update.
> 
>          </Mattias>
> 
>         jkowall wrote (2010-08-31 14:19):
> 
>             Depends on the version of Unix you are on exactly.  I customized
>             the init script quite a bit, so I don't use the one which ships
>             with Resin.  Which version/distribution are you using?  I can 
> share
>             the one I use if you'd like.
> 
>             -jk
> 
> 
>             On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Mattias Jiderhamn <
>             mj-li...@expertsystems.se> wrote:
> 
>                 (I am not by far a *nix wizz, nor the admin of our production
>                 servers,
>                 so please bear with me)
> 
>                 Historically we have edited the /etc/init.d/resin script to
>                 customize
>                 the Resin startup, such as setting the server root directory 
> or
>                 assigning CPU cores with taskdef.
>                 In the 4.0.x branch this file is overwritten at each minor
>                 upgrade by
>                 "make install". Does this mean this is (no longer) the
>                 recommended way
>                 of configuring the startup, and there is some other means we
>                 should look
>                 at instead...?
> 
>                 --
> 
>                   </Mattias>
> 
> 
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> resin-interest mailing list
> resin-interest@caucho.com
> http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest



_______________________________________________
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest

Reply via email to