dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #43796: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43796#issuecomment-1812013863
> @dongjoon-hyun I want to clarify the issue. We don't want to use `record` here because `field` in the original class doesn't provide an Accessor, but since `record` automatically generates an Accessor method, it exposes the information of `field`. So, in similar scenarios, we shouldn't use `record`, right? Yes, exactly. That's the point. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
