Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17614#discussion_r111064001
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/DataType.scala ---
    @@ -288,4 +288,30 @@ object DataType {
           case (fromDataType, toDataType) => fromDataType == toDataType
         }
       }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Returns true if the two data types share the same "shape", i.e. the 
types (including
    +   * nullability) are the same, but the field names don't need to be the 
same.
    +   */
    +  def equalsStructurally(from: DataType, to: DataType): Boolean = {
    +    (from, to) match {
    +      case (left: ArrayType, right: ArrayType) =>
    +        equalsStructurally(left.elementType, right.elementType) &&
    +          left.containsNull == right.containsNull
    --- End diff --
    
    That's not symmetric. equalsStructurally should be symmetric, unless we 
rename this something else (e.g. structurallyCastable)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to