Github user logannc commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18945
  
    I've continued to use @HyukjinKwon 's suggestion because it should be more 
performant and is capable of handling it without loss of precision. I believe 
I've addressed your concerns by only changing the type when we encounter a null 
(duh).


---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to