Github user gczsjdy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19862
This is actually a small change, but it can provide not small optimization
for users who don't use `WholeStageCodegen`, for example there're still some
users who use under 2.0 version of Spark.
Also, the behavior of codegen and non-codegen code paths are supposed to be
the same, so in this way it is a 'bug'.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
