Github user maryannxue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21403
@mgaido91 I see. But by using Seq[Expression] in `In`, can we hopefully
remove `ResolveInValues`. I wouldn't mind changing the parser if it's necessary
and if it saves work elsewhere. Having such a temporary expression which
doesn't mean anything more than a wrapper of Seq[Expression] doesn't look like
a very clean approach to me.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
