Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
Essentially, this PR was created to take the management of #21320 out of my
hands, with a view towards facilitating its incorporation into Spark 2.4. It
was my suggestion, one based in frustration. In hindsight, I no longer believe
this strategy is the bestâor most expedientâapproach towards progress.
Indeed, I believe the direction of this PR has become orthogonal to its
motivating goal, becoming a dispute between myself and @HyukjinKwon rather than
a means to move things along.
I believe I can shepherd #21320 in a way that will promote greater
progress. @ajacques, I mean no disrespect, and I thank you for volunteering
your time, patience and effort for the sake of all that are interested in
seeing this patch become a part of Spark. And I apologize for letting you down,
letting everyone down. In my conduct leading up to the creation of this PR I
did not act with the greatest maturity or patience. And I did not act in the
best interests of the community.
No one has spent more time or more effort, taken more responsibility or
exhibited more patience with this 2+ year patch-set-in-the-making than myself.
I respectfully submit it is mine to present and manage, and no one else's.
Insofar as I have expressed otherwise in the past, I admit my errorâone made
in frustrationâand recant in hindsight.
@ajacques, at this point I respectfully assert that managing the patch set
I submitted in #21320 is not your responsibility, nor is it anyone else's but
mine. I ask you to close this PR so that we can resume the review in #21320. As
I stated there, you are welcome to open a PR on
https://github.com/VideoAmp/spark-public/tree/spark-4502-parquet_column_pruning-foundation
to submit the changes you've made for review.
Thank you.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
