Github user rednaxelafx commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23079#discussion_r234508561 --- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/expressions.scala --- @@ -767,6 +767,15 @@ object ReplaceNullWithFalse extends Rule[LogicalPlan] { replaceNullWithFalse(cond) -> value } cw.copy(branches = newBranches) + case af @ ArrayFilter(_, lf @ LambdaFunction(func, _, _)) => --- End diff -- I'm not sure if that's useful or not. First of all, the `replaceNullWithFalse` handling doesn't apply to all higher-order functions. In fact it only applies to a very narrow set, ones where a lambda function returns `BooleanType` and is immediately used as a predicate. So having a generic utility can certainly help make this PR slightly simpler, but I don't know how useful it is for other cases. I'd prefer waiting for more such transformation cases to introduce a new utility for the pattern. WDYT?
--- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org