Github user seancxmao commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23258#discussion_r239995952 --- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/metric/SQLMetricsSuite.scala --- @@ -182,10 +182,13 @@ class SQLMetricsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with SQLMetricsTestUtils with Shared } test("Sort metrics") { - // Assume the execution plan is - // WholeStageCodegen(nodeId = 0, Range(nodeId = 2) -> Sort(nodeId = 1)) - val ds = spark.range(10).sort('id) - testSparkPlanMetrics(ds.toDF(), 2, Map.empty) + // Assume the execution plan with node id is + // Sort(nodeId = 0) + // Exchange(nodeId = 1) + // Range(nodeId = 2) + val df = spark.range(9, -1, -1).sort('id).toDF() --- End diff -- Using `Seq` instead of `Range`, we makes things simpler and more readable. I'll change to use `Seq`.
--- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org