https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15254
--- Comment #8 from Frank B <coffeecupfr...@gmail.com> --- Quick addition: You can say it's a "corner case", a result of wrong assumptions regarding u/I or a weird usecase but you can't say "nothing has changed" since that clearly isn't true. The question is: is uI supported (the documentation does not state this) and which behavior is correct, the old one before the update or the new one - or which behavior would you expect? I have a working solution now but that's definitely a point to be clarified and at least to be updated in the documentation. There could be other users too using this combination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
