On Thursday, February 8, 2024 at 10:16:58 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
On Wednesday, February 7, 2024 at 1:11:14 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: Let's also use this anniversary as an opportunity to discuss what still needs improving in our development workflows. *1. We have a low development velocity.* For example, some simple PRs sit for weeks or months before receiving any review comments. What can we do to improve this? *2. Is our community aware of the sagemath/sage GitHub wiki?* https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki - Are the contents of the wiki front page useful? - Are the links to Issue and Pull Request queries helpful? *3. Are the labels on GitHub Issues / PRs helpful?* - Note that new contributors who are not in the Triage team cannot set/change labels! - This includes component labels, but also status labels such as "needs review". - Is it time for the next step with syncing status labels (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35927)? - Wishlist item: Component auto-labeler for GitHub PRs (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37373) - Wishlist item: PR size labeler (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37262) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/7fbf41b4-cd94-480e-94fe-85ff625c2ad3n%40googlegroups.com.
