Yes, I'd say so.

On Wednesday 28 February 2024 at 14:57:26 UTC+1 Giacomo Pope wrote:

> Ahh ok, thank you. Considering the following output I think a PR to make 
> the degree of zero for these Laurent classes -Infinity is reasonable?
>
> ```
> sage: R.<x> = LaurentSeriesRing(QQ)
> sage: R.zero().valuation()
> +Infinity
> sage: R.zero().degree()
> -1
> sage: 
> sage: R.<x> = LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ)
> sage: R.zero().valuation()
> +Infinity
> sage: R.zero().degree()
> -1
> sage: 
> sage: R.<x> = LazyLaurentSeriesRing(QQ)
> sage: R.zero().valuation()
> +Infinity
> sage: R.zero().degree()
> # Errors
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 1:50:23 PM UTC Martin R wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I confused it with valuation, but I guess it is still a related 
>> question.
>> On Wednesday 28 February 2024 at 14:36:35 UTC+1 Giacomo Pope wrote:
>>
>>> This is not what I see on the current beta:
>>>
>>> sage: R.<x> = LaurentSeriesRing(QQ)
>>> sage: R.zero().degree()
>>> -1
>>> sage: R.<x> = LazyLaurentSeriesRing(QQ)
>>> sage: R.zero().degree()
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> AttributeError                            Traceback (most recent call 
>>> last)
>>> Cell In[4], line 1
>>> ----> 1 R.zero().degree()
>>>
>>> File ~/sage/sage/src/sage/structure/element.pyx:489, in 
>>> sage.structure.element.Element.__getattr__()
>>>     487         AttributeError: 
>>> 'LeftZeroSemigroup_with_category.element_class' object has no attribute 
>>> 'blah_blah'...
>>>     488     """
>>> --> 489     return self.getattr_from_category(name)
>>>     490 
>>>     491 cdef getattr_from_category(self, name) noexcept:
>>>
>>> File ~/sage/sage/src/sage/structure/element.pyx:502, in 
>>> sage.structure.element.Element.getattr_from_category()
>>>     500     else:
>>>     501         cls = P._abstract_element_class
>>> --> 502     return getattr_from_other_class(self, cls, name)
>>>     503 
>>>     504 def __dir__(self):
>>>
>>> File ~/sage/sage/src/sage/cpython/getattr.pyx:357, in 
>>> sage.cpython.getattr.getattr_from_other_class()
>>>     355     dummy_error_message.cls = type(self)
>>>     356     dummy_error_message.name = name
>>> --> 357     raise AttributeError(dummy_error_message)
>>>     358 cdef PyObject* attr = instance_getattr(cls, name)
>>>     359 if attr is NULL:
>>>
>>> AttributeError: 'LazyLaurentSeriesRing_with_category.element_class' 
>>> object has no attribute 'degree'
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 at 12:05:32 PM UTC Martin R wrote:
>>>
>>>> LazyLaurentSeriesRing(QQ) currently gives +Infinity.
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 28 February 2024 at 12:50:45 UTC+1 Giacomo Pope wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> While chasing various bugs which appeared in the CI, I ended up adding 
>>>>> a small method for computing random elements for the 
>>>>> LaurentPolynomialRing 
>>>>> class.
>>>>>
>>>>> When writing randomised testing I got myself confused about the degree 
>>>>> of the zero polynomial. For the univariate and multivariate polynomial 
>>>>> rings, we currently use that the degree for 0 (both R(0).degree() as well 
>>>>> as R(0).degree(x)) is -1. This is unambiguous for the case of these types.
>>>>>
>>>>> However for the LaurentPolynomialRings, a polynomial with negative 
>>>>> valuation is very natural. For example the following code snippet shows 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> ambiguity.
>>>>>
>>>>> sage: L.<x> = LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ)
>>>>> sage: f = (1/x); f
>>>>> x^-1
>>>>> sage: f.degree()
>>>>> -1
>>>>> sage: L.zero().degree()
>>>>> -1
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't feel familiar enough with the mathematics here and the usual 
>>>>> use cases in sage to offer a PR "fixing" this, or whether it even needs 
>>>>> fixing. However, I got confused so I thought maybe others might get 
>>>>> confused and someone on this list might have a suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the "usual" suggestion would be to have the degree as -infty, 
>>>>> but then there's a question about whether this should be done for other 
>>>>> polynomial rings...
>>>>>
>>>>> I made an issue for this on GitHub too:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37491
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/af56b134-6c48-4d4d-aad8-cbfa1adc1d28n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to