I think this doesn't work. E.g. the proposal talks about setting PRs to "needs work", but banned by the PR's author team members can't do this.
That's why, as I said already, bans break the normal workflow, be it reviewing or voting. On 4 March 2024 22:08:29 GMT, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >Dima, I think that if anyone is incapable of posting to a particular PR, >they should send email to someone who can post and ask them to record the >person's vote, resulting in a comment like "I am posting to record 1 >negative vote from X, 2 positive votes from Y and Z". > > >Yes, that would also go for those who do not choose to use GH. > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"sage-devel" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >To view this discussion on the web visit >https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/0ae620d2-8a84-4290-bf03-66f2d0d03264n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/17148F09-3727-4760-88BC-924D13EA741B%40gmail.com.
