I vote for making sage part of emacs, actually. Well, in fact, it *is* part of emacs.
Martin Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 19:46:09 UTC+2 schrieb John H Palmieri: > > > > On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 10:40:36 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: >> >> On 2017-09-27 16:10, Vincent Delecroix wrote: >> > Not sufficient: the package has to be useful for Sage and used in >> > Sage... emacs is unlikely to become an optional package even if it >> > satisfies the above conditions. >> >> That's why I added "as opposed to experimental" :-) >> >> emacs shouldn't be experimental either. >> > > Indeed, it should be mandatory. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
