Basically, unless anyone with need, time, and knowledge to maintain sagenb steps forward, it should be deprecated and removed. Or funds found to pay someone to do this work.
I stopped using sagenb ages ago, and have much better ways to use my time. On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 12:01:16 PM UTC+3, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > There is nobody with enough knowledge of the guts of sagenb to maintain > it, and frankly the sooner it is deprecated and removed, > the better. > > On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 1:04:32 AM UTC+3, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> On ticket 25382, https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25382, the following >> questions have been raised: >> >> - Is the old Sage notebook deprecated? >> >> - If not, should it be? >> >> - In any case, the documentation builds with Python 2. It does not build >> (because sagenb is not Python 3 compatible) with Python 3. Should we >> completely remove the sagenb documentation from the reference manual, or >> should we do it conditionally on whether we're using Python 2 or not? >> >> I'm happy to hear discussion rather than (or in addition to) just votes. >> >> -- >> John >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
