On Sun, 24 Mar 2019, Nico Van Cleemput wrote: > If you use the normal splitting with geng, it might become more even if you > go to a higher number of > parts. However, it will never be completely even.
We could also use geng to split output to for example 100 parts and then combine parts so that we get 10 almost equal sized part. But then, it may be that in following computation almost all time is used for only few graphs. As an example: take all posets on 10 elements and compute the dimension. Now exactly one poset, the standard example of 2 × 5 elements, will take very long time. Of course similar does not always occur, it depends on what we are computing. -- Jori Mäntysalo Tampereen yliopisto - Ihminen ratkaisee -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
