On Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 1:25:11 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: > > Le 07/06/2019 à 16:44, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > > On 2019-06-07 16:38, E. Madison Bray wrote: > >> While I agree it's part of an annoying trend, this is one change I > >> welcome: The Python interpreter shipped in OSX has always *always* > >> been broken and unusable > > > > What matters for Sage is: was it sufficiently functional to bootstrap a > > build of Sage? > > Not only. As Volker said in the initial message of the thread, Python is > a dependency of the Sage binaries. >
Although Sage binaries come with functioning builds of Python, so we could conceivably use those if there is no system Python. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/0736a122-d9e8-4036-b066-bc749cde9ef8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
